Fri. Mar 5th, 2021

Last week’s stats on Fylde seemed to prove popular so I’ve done something similar this week for the Rosslyn Park game. They do provide some surprises. What they certainly don’t do is offer answers to many of the concerns raised by Coventry’s recent run of poor performances, but they should generate plenty of discussion. I guess some of what is detailed below will have formed the basis of conversations amongst the coaches and within the training sessions this week.

So, here we go…

Home/away league tables

Coventry 9th in the league based on home games only (av. 2.5 pts pg)

Rosslyn Park 8th in the league based on away games only (av. 3.0 pts pg)

Verdict: Park’s away form is better than Coventry’s home form. Not a great stat to begin with!

Tries scored

Coventry: 24 (14 home, 10 away, 14 first half, 10 second half)

Rosslyn Park: 28 (17 home, 11 away, 13 first half, 15 second half)

Rosslyn Park have scored more tries in total than Coventry, but are not as prolific away from home.  Cov tend to score more tries in the first half, whilst Richmond, like Fylde last week, tend to score more in the second half. However, only 11 tries of their tries have been scored in the last 20 mins of the first half and the first 20 mins of the second half, suggesting Park tend to start and finish strongly in comparison with the rest of the game.

Verdict: Coventry must make sure that they don’t switch off in the last 20. A strong bench could help here.

Tries conceded

Coventry: 21 (12 home, 9 away, 12 first half, 9 second half).

Rosslyn Park: 20 (8 home, 12 away, 9 first half, 11 second half).

As well as scoring more tries in the second half, Rosslyn Park also tend to concede more tries here as well, particularly in the last quarter (7 in total). Perhaps with the game opening in the final quarter, Park’s defence is a little more suspect?

Verdict: Coventry mustn’t sit on the 40m line and wait as they have tended to do; they must attack more. A willingness to play in Park’s 22 late on is a must both to make the most of errors as a result of tiredness in the final quarter and to ensure that RP have to attack from deep if they are going to score.

Tries by position – for

Coventry: backs 11, forwards 13 (front row 8, centres 8).

Rosslyn Park: backs 12, forwards 16 (back row 10).

Verdict: Coventry, even in the absence of Knox, still have the ability to score through their centres, and the front row (especially Price and Hope) are a potent threat. For Park, its pretty evident that the back row are the real danger, although what’s not clear is how many of these are from close range, the result of catch and drives or rolling mauls. Hugo Ellis will, as always, be someone Cov have to keep a close eye on.

Tries by position – against

Coventry: 21 – 10 in the backs (7 from the wings), 9 in the forwards and 2 penalty tries.

Rosslyn Park: 20 – 14 in the backs, 6 in the forwards.

Verdict: IMPORTANT! The vast majority of tries scored against Park have come through the opposition backs and all of those through the centres and half backs (none through the wings or full back). With our centres scoring most of our tries, it suggest we could have a significant advantage here, provided we allow the backs into the game. It would seem that in the last 5-10ms, Rosslyn Park’s defence must be strong given they have only conceded 5 tries though opposing forwards, adding weight to importance of letting the backs run at Park.

Points given up

Rosslyn  Park have conceded 4 tries away from home twice so far this season. Coventry have conceded 4 at home once. No real advantage to either side here, perhaps Coventry slightly more likely to get the additional bonus point than Park…?

Verdict: A close game in prospect…?


Coventry: 11 yellows/1 red  – worst in the league. This doesn’t include Evans’ second yellow last week that was converted into a red –  average of 1.57 cards a game (7 first half, 4 second half, 4 home, 7 away).

Rosslyn Park:  3 yellows – equal best in the league –  average of 0.43 a game (1 first half, 2 second half, 2 home, 1 away).

Park have only had 2 yellows away from home. Coventry have had 4 at home, but their discipline is appalling and could prove costly in a tight game. A definite concern.

Verdict: Coventry remain in danger of losing at least one player for 10 minutes.

Half time win table

Coventry have led at half time in 4 of their 7 games, going on to win all of them, still the best conversion rate in the league.

Rosslyn Park have led at half time in 6 of their games, winning 5 of them. 

In a losing position at half time in 1 game, Park went on to lose the game. Coventry have lost  all 3 games in which they were trailing at the half way mark. Going into half-time with a decent lead means Cov would be strong favourites to win the game.

Verdict: Coventry need to have a lead at half time!

Kicking strike rate

Matt Jones – Coventry: 66.67% (14/22C, 12/17P).

Tom Whitely – Rosslyn Park: 73.68% (8/13C, 6/6P).

Matt’s had an inconsistent time with the boot this season; a capable kicker but less reliable than he should be at this level. Tom Whitely has shared kicking duties with Sam Stanley. His success rate is good and clearly Cov can’t afford to give him any opportunities to kick for goal. And with Cov’s tendency to give away far too many penalties; that’s going to be a big ask.

Verdict: Park to win the battle of the kickers .

Leading points scorers

Coventry: Matt Jones with 55 points (11C, 11P).

Rosslyn Park:  Tom Whiteley with 49 points (15C, 8P).

Leading try scorer

Hugo Ellis - Park's leading try scorer this season. Again.
Hugo Ellis – Park’s leading try scorer this season. Again.

Coventry: Matt Price with 4 (Knox 3, Hope 3).

Rosslyn Park : Hugo Ellis with 6.

Verdict: Ellis must fancy his chances of adding to his total on Saturday. Few would bet against him doing so.

Home attendance

Coventry average 1,163 at home games, the highest in the league.

Verdict:  a bigger than average crowd must get behind the team and roar them on. It’s been all too quiet in the last two games.

I’m sure the coaches of both teams will have far more detailed stats, but it’s a bit like Championship Manager – how do you set up your team to play to its strengths whilst also being aware of those of the opposition? Let’s hope Cov get it all right on Saturday.

By Tim

3 thought on “Coventry v Rosslyn Park – more lies, damned lies….”
  1. Hi Mojo…thanks for this, it’s something that should be shared. Had heard something similar, too, but from supporters rather than players. I’m surprised the coaches weren’t aware of Danny’s departure, that is a real worry and it’s a situation that just can’t be allowed to continue. I don’t know what Jon Sharp makes of all this; he doesn’t seem to be someone who would allow such divisions within the management for long.

    The players who weren’t playing and there as spectators looked far from happy…whole situation is a far cry from the optimism most of us felt after the first couple of games.

    And if we start to try and buy ourselves out of trouble we’re in danger of spiralling into the financial abyss.

  2. Being a staunch Coventry fan and supporting them for a number of years it hurts me to send this message. After speaking to a number of players this evening I feel I have got to the crux of the problem; Phil Maynard. The players are terrified of ‘having an opinion’ or ‘not conforming’ to what he wants. They have basically been told to put up and shut up or they are out. Dan Wright moving to Chinoor is a prime example; he was only aware of the transfer when Chinoor phoned him on Thursday evening to ask if he was attending training. As a committed player, and after checking with Maynard, he attended training at Chinoor. However, the coaching team at Coventry hadn’t been advised of this either. This just goes to show the lack of communication between the players, coaching staff and the management. Furthermore, the fact that the players are terrified of stepping out of line with the discipline of toe the line or you’re out is unbelievable. My source today had revealed that they, as a club, are just buying in players to fix the problems rather than create consistency. I’ve also been told that yet another new player from Japan is due to start. Instead of chasing the dream by buying in new players why isn’t Maynard creating a ethos of consistency? The team we had last year were a consistent, cohesive team. At the risk of sounding like Someone who knows what they are talking about I think serious questions need to be asked about how Maynard is driving this team forward or into the ground.

Any thoughts:

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.